You say you want something, yet when it becomes possible, you hesitate. You want to be seen, but delay when an opportunity appears. You want closeness, then pull away when someone gets too close. You want more freedom, yet somehow keep filling every available hour.

We call this self sabotage. But before deciding that something inside you is working against you, look at the word self.

Who is the self that is supposedly doing the sabotaging?

The immediate answer is probably, “Me.”

But what exactly have you been calling “me”?

Over time, experiences, memories, roles, beliefs and definitions were gathered together and bundled into one character: “This is me.” I am capable. I am independent. I am the one people rely on. I need to succeed. I cannot look foolish. I have to know what I am doing. I am bad with money. I am shy. I am strong. I do not need anyone.

Some of those definitions may seem helpful. Others may feel limiting. Most are rarely questioned because they do not feel like beliefs anymore. They feel like you.

Now suppose you genuinely want a bigger opportunity. You want the money, the experience, the freedom or simply the chance to do something that excites you. Nothing about that desire is a problem.

But perhaps the character called “me” also contains the definition, “I am the person who knows what I am doing.”

The new opportunity may require you to learn publicly, make mistakes, ask questions or enter a situation where you are no longer the expert.

Suddenly the hesitation makes sense.

Not because some hidden force is trying to ruin your life, but because moving toward what you want appears to threaten one of the definitions you have been using to know yourself.

You probably will not consciously think, “I must protect my identity as the competent one.” You may procrastinate. Decide you need more preparation. Find another project that suddenly seems urgent. Tell yourself the timing is wrong.

So rather than asking only, “Why am I sabotaging myself?”, try asking:

What would have to be true about me for this hesitation to make sense?

Maybe, “I cannot afford to fail.”

Maybe, “I cannot let people see me not knowing.”

Maybe, “If I need someone, I am weak.”

Maybe, “If I rest, I am wasting time.”

Maybe, “If I succeed, people will expect more from me.”

Now the definition underneath the hesitation has become visible.

Then ask something different:

Is that actually true? Or is it a definition that has been mistaken for reality?

Making a mistake does not contain the meaning, “I am inadequate.” Needing someone does not contain the meaning, “I am weak.” Rest does not contain the meaning, “I am wasting time.” Those meanings come through the character interpreting what appears.

Once the definition is seen as a definition rather than simply “how things are,” another possibility becomes available.

The same applies in relationships, money, work, creativity and almost anywhere else. Someone may want intimacy while believing, “I have to protect myself from needing anyone.” Someone may want financial ease while carrying, “Money only comes through struggle.” Someone may want to be seen while also believing, “Being visible makes me vulnerable.”

The problem is not that one part of you is good and another part is bad.

The conflict appears inside the character you have been calling “me.”

That character wants something while simultaneously carrying definitions that make having it appear dangerous, impossible or inconsistent with who it believes itself to be.

See the definition, and another possibility may become visible. Then notice something even more fundamental.

If a belief you once called “me” can be seen, questioned and dropped, how much of what you have been calling “me” is actually fixed?

And if the character can be seen, what is it that is seeing it?

Continue: Why do I keep repeating the same patterns? | Explore all questions